Which statement best describes the effect of Maryland court decisions on later cases?

Which statement best describes the effect of Maryland court decisions on later cases?

• A. It sets binding precedent for Maryland courts
• B. It is persuasive only and not binding
• C. It applies only to the litigants in the case
• D. It can be overturned by the Governor

Answer: (A)

Maryland court decisions create binding precedent through the rule of stare decisis. When a Maryland court decides a legal issue, that ruling sets the rule future Maryland courts must follow in similar cases, ensuring consistency and predictability across the state's judiciary. This binding effect applies to all Maryland courts—from trial courts up through the Court of Appeals—and only changes if a higher Maryland court overrules it or legislation alters the relevant law. Decisions from outside Maryland can be persuasive but aren’t controlling in Maryland courts. The Governor cannot overturn court decisions.

Maryland court decisions create binding precedent through the rule of stare decisis. When a Maryland court decides a legal issue, that ruling sets the rule future Maryland courts must follow in similar cases, ensuring consistency and predictability across the state's judiciary. This binding effect applies to all Maryland courts—from trial courts up through the Court of Appeals—and only changes if a higher Maryland court overrules it or legislation alters the relevant law. Decisions from outside Maryland can be persuasive but aren’t controlling in Maryland courts. The Governor cannot overturn court decisions.